|
Environmental Issues - Cairns, North Queensland, AustraliaEnvironmental Issues facing the Cairns Esplanade
Even the Cairns Esplanade has been a part of the action. In 1989, 6000 people protested against the ‘Trinity Point’ development, which proposed a hotel and tourist facility on the esplanade mudflats. A major campaign, led by Cairns doctor Michael Mansfield, was launched to put a stop to the development. The swell of local dissent with the proposal enticed the Queensland Labor government to withdraw consent for the development shortly after it was elected in late 1989. It seemed the Cairns Esplanade was safe. But the people of Cairns have changed their opinions about the Esplanade in recent years. Instead of perceiving it as a unique environmental habitat for thousands of animals, it has become an eyesore that damages the reputation of the city and hinders tourism. No major campaigns were launched in protest to Cairns City Council proposals to develop the site, and the Cairns people have backed their council despite the inconvenience of a lengthy construction phase in the city centre. Environmental Impact of the foreshore development
An example taken from the Cairns City Council website claims, “For instance the loss of water bird habitat in the area that has been reclaimed, is to be compensated by undertaking a long-term monitoring program and by increasing awareness of the international significance of migratory waders through interpretive signage, etc.” The importance of environmental issues on the site was recognised from the inception of the project, particularly the bird life, which attracts visitors from around the world. Prior to the appointment of any of the design team, a bird specialist was contracted to report on existing environmental values and to identify opportunities to minimise developmental impact. The outcome was that rather than being threatened by the development, the bird life is intended to become one of its most important attractions. Key environmental issues were identified in the initial public consultation stage and incorporated into the design brief.
Environmental Impact AssessmentAn Environmental Impact Assessment has been undertaken to assess potential impacts and to develop mitigation strategies. The study found that the long-term impact of the development would be positive. The construction phase had some negative impacts, such as noise and dust, but this is expected of any development project. Environmentalists, however, are not entirely happy with the impact statement. They say flaws are apparent and the statement contravenes the spirit of the Trinity Inlet Management Plan because it ignores the No Net Loss of habitat concept, and the Precautionary Principle. (This is a concept that says proposals should always look for alternatives if any environmental impact could result.) Opponents to the development also say the statement simply assumes that inshore wading birds will be able to find other places to go. What happens now?
|